Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zettat123
77c56e29de
Allow non-admin users to delete review requests (#29057)
Fix #14459

The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit

(cherry picked from commit c42083a33950be6ee9f822c6d0de3c3a79d1f51b)

Conflicts:
	models/repo/repo_list_test.go
	tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
	tests/integration/api_repo_test.go
	shared fixture counts
2024-02-26 22:30:27 +01:00
6543
f796548225
Workaround to clean up old reviews on creating a new one (#28554)
close  #28542

blocks  #28544

---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*

(cherry picked from commit 217d71c48a10265e08b95cc961656b921f61f9ff)

Conflicts:
	tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go
	context
2024-02-26 21:42:14 +01:00
Earl Warren
0b503e5e86
[GITEA] DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments/{comment}
* reuse deleteIssueComment by adding the commentType parameter
* ensure tests start with a PR with no random reviews from fixtures

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 5b90ab77f6)
(cherry picked from commit 28ecd6f5a6)
(cherry picked from commit 24870cf133)
2024-02-05 16:09:43 +01:00
Earl Warren
bd1cea3f82
[GITEA] GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments/{comment}
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 69fcf26dee)
(cherry picked from commit 1296f4d115)
(cherry picked from commit 119d10d9e2)
(cherry picked from commit eb5b55b1b7)
2024-02-05 16:09:43 +01:00
Earl Warren
603a44edf0
[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 8b4ba3dce7)
(cherry picked from commit 196edea0f9)

[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review

If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.

The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.

Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.

The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.

(cherry picked from commit 6a555996dc)
(cherry picked from commit b173a0ccee)
(cherry picked from commit 838ab9740a)
2024-02-05 16:09:42 +01:00
KN4CK3R
838db2f891
Convert to url auth to header auth in tests (#28484)
Related #28390
2023-12-21 23:59:59 +00:00
JakobDev
cf0df023be
More db.DefaultContext refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065

This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
silverwind
88f835192d
Replace interface{} with any (#25686)
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
Jack Hay
18de83b2a3
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
    - `activitypub`
    - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
    - `misc`
    - `notification`
    - `organization`
    - `package`
    - `issue`
    - `repository`
    - `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
  -  `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
  - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection

### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">

## tokenRequiresScopes  Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error

## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
   -  _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
   - For example: 
   ```go
	m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
		m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
		m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
   ```

## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default

Closes #24501
Closes #24799

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
KN4CK3R
f1173d6879
Use more specific test methods (#24265)
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-22 17:56:27 -04:00
Chongyi Zheng
de484e86bc
Support scoped access tokens (#20908)
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.

The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.


- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)

I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.

Fixes #4300
2023-01-17 15:46:03 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
df676a47d0
Remove session in api tests (#21984)
It's no meaning to request an API route with session.
2022-12-01 22:39:42 -05:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
Kyle D
c8ded77680
Kd/ci playwright go test (#20123)
* Add initial playwright config

* Simplify Makefile

* Simplify Makefile

* Use correct config files

* Update playwright settings

* Fix package-lock file

* Don't use test logger for e2e tests

* fix frontend lint

* Allow passing TEST_LOGGER variable

* Init postgres database

* use standard gitea env variables

* Update playwright

* update drone

* Move empty env var to commands

* Cleanup

* Move integrations to subfolder

* tests integrations to tests integraton

* Run e2e tests with go test

* Fix linting

* install CI deps

* Add files to ESlint

* Fix drone typo

* Don't log to console in CI

* Use go test http server

* Add build step before tests

* Move shared init function to common package

* fix drone

* Clean up tests

* Fix linting

* Better mocking for page + version string

* Cleanup test generation

* Remove dependency on gitea binary

* Fix linting

* add initial support for running specific tests

* Add ACCEPT_VISUAL variable

* don't require git-lfs

* Add initial documentation

* Review feedback

* Add logged in session test

* Attempt fixing drone race

* Cleanup and bump version

* Bump deps

* Review feedback

* simplify installation

* Fix ci

* Update install docs
2022-09-02 15:18:23 -04:00
Renamed from integrations/api_pull_review_test.go (Browse further)