- Add a indication to the file history if the file has been renamed,
this indication contains a link to browse the history of the file
further.
- Added unit testing.
- Added integration testing.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1279
(cherry picked from commit 72c297521b)
- If there's a code comment that's received during the migration that
contains no diffhunk, skip it. This either means it was commenting on
old diffhunk or it's just a general codecomment. Forgejo supports
neither of such type of code comment.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1407
(cherry picked from commit ae463c7c55)
(cherry picked from commit bf48f02a86)
- Currently the repository description uses the same sanitizer as a
normal markdown document. This means that element such as heading and
images are allowed and can be abused.
- Create a minimal restricted sanitizer for the repository description,
which only allows what the postprocessor currently allows, which are
links and emojis.
- Added unit testing.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1202
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1122
(cherry picked from commit a8afa4cd18)
(cherry picked from commit 0238587c51)
System users (Ghost, ActionsUser, etc) have a negative id and may be
the author of a comment, either because it was created by a now
deleted user or via an action using a transient token.
The GetPossibleUserByID function has special cases related to system
users and will not fail if given a negative id.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1425
(cherry picked from commit 97667e06b3)
(cherry picked from commit 8ef73a09c9)
Signed-off-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f48e3ff0db)
Removing comments and make command
(cherry picked from commit 7664a423a5)
(cherry picked from commit b2fb435364)
(cherry picked from commit 0a24a819a9)
(cherry picked from commit 155cc19f75)
(cherry picked from commit 223537f71a)
- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit b0c3075a79)
(cherry picked from commit f61505281c)
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe)
(cherry picked from commit 5ee4cf2ed9)
(cherry picked from commit 601f00e530)
(cherry picked from commit 9ce8aa57fb)
- This is actually https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19978 &
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19486 but was removed in one of
the UI refactors of v1.20
- This is a very technical fix and is best explained in the CSS
comments. But the short version: When there's an overflow being set, but
you want an element to 'break out' of that overflow with `position:
absolute`, it sometimes doesn't work! You need to set some CSS to let
the browser know that the element needs to use an element outside of
that overflow as 'clip parent'.
- Resolves my internal frustration with the mobile UI constantly getting broken.
(cherry picked from commit 879f842bed)
(cherry picked from commit 6099c9b41b)
(cherry picked from commit 0749d00b16)
(cherry picked from commit ec6a5428a7)
(cherry picked from commit 9d0bee784d)
(cherry picked from commit 61d6ae4882)
- Databases are one of the most important parts of Forgejo, every
interaction with Forgejo uses the database in one way or another.
Therefore, it is important to maintain the database and recognize when
Forgejo is not doing well with the database. Forgejo already has the
option to log *every* SQL query along with its execution time, but
monitoring becomes impractical for larger instances and takes up
unnecessary storage in the logs.
- Add a QoL enhancement that allows instance administrators to specify a
threshold value beyond which query execution time is logged as a warning
in the xorm logger. The default value is a conservative five seconds to
avoid this becoming a source of spam in the logs.
- The use case for this patch is that with an instance the size of Codeberg, monitoring SQL logs is not very fruitful and most of them are uninteresting. Recently, in the context of persistent deadlock issues (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/220), I have noticed that certain queries hold locks on tables like comment and issue for several seconds. This patch helps to identify which queries these are and when they happen.
- Added unit test.
(cherry picked from commit 24bbe7886f)
(cherry picked from commit 6e29145b3c)
(cherry picked from commit 63731e3071)
(cherry picked from commit 3ce1a09736)
(cherry picked from commit a64426907d)
(cherry picked from commit 4b19215691)
- The `<title>` element that lives inside the `<head>` element is an important element that gives browsers and search engine crawlers the title of the webpage, hence the element name. It's therefor important that this title is accurate.
- Currently there are three issues with titles on repositories. It doesn't use the `FullName` and instead only uses the repository name, this doesn't distinguish which user or organisation the repository is on. It doesn't show the full treepath in the title when visiting an file inside a directory and instead only uses the latest path in treepath. It can show the repository name twice if the `.Title` variable also included the repository name such as on the repository homepage.
- Use the repository's fullname (which include which user the repository is on) instead of just their name.
- Display the repository's fullname if it isn't already in `.Title`.
- Use the full treepath in the repository code view instead of just the
last path.
- Adds integration tests.
- Adds a new repository (`repo59`) that has 3 depths for folders, which
wasn't in any other fixture repository yet, so the full treepath for
could be properly tested.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1276
(cherry picked from commit ff9a6a2cda)
(cherry picked from commit 76dffc8621)
(cherry picked from commit ff0615b9d0)
(cherry picked from commit 8712eaa394)
(cherry picked from commit 0c11587582)
(cherry picked from commit 3cbd9fb792)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/repo_test.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1512
- The code and tests are already there to allow releases to be created
on commits.
- This patch modifies the web code to take into account that an commitID
could've been passed as target.
- Added unit test.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1196
(cherry picked from commit 90863e0ab5)
(cherry picked from commit c805aa23b5)
(cherry picked from commit cf45567ca6)
(cherry picked from commit 672a2b91e5)
(cherry picked from commit 82c930152c)
(cherry picked from commit 95ac2508b3)
(cherry picked from commit b13a81ab98)
(cherry picked from commit 9f463a7c1f)
- Currently in the cron tasks, the 'Previous Time' only displays the
previous time of when the cron library executes the function, but not
any of the manual executions of the task.
- Store the last run's time in memory in the Task struct and use that,
when that time is later than time that the cron library has executed this
task.
- This ensures that if an instance admin manually starts a task, there's
feedback that this task is/has been run, because the task might be run
that quick, that the status icon already has been changed to an
checkmark,
- Tasks that are executed at startup now reflect this as well, as the
time of the execution of that task on startup is now being shown as
'Previous Time'.
- Added integration tests for the API part, which is easier to test
because querying the HTML table of cron tasks is non-trivial.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/949
(cherry picked from commit 0475e2048e)
(cherry picked from commit dcc952f0db)
(cherry picked from commit 7168a240e8)
(cherry picked from commit 4bc4cccb1b)
(cherry picked from commit 3fe019ca3c)
[GITEA] Show manual cron run's last time (squash) 26 jobs in cron fixtures
(cherry picked from commit 8473030628)
(cherry picked from commit 871c729742)
(cherry picked from commit daefb27d2c)
(cherry picked from commit 2f66c1e4ce)
(cherry picked from commit cdaa9615f4)
- Resolves#271
- Ensure that the adminstrator password is at least `MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH`.
(cherry picked from commit 28cb04c3f5)
(cherry picked from commit 95371ebd92)
(cherry picked from commit a134288ab6)
(cherry picked from commit 4202f052cb)
(cherry picked from commit 510b7467d3)
(cherry picked from commit f3a6e1f121)
(cherry picked from commit f340508819)
(cherry picked from commit b891bb176d)
(cherry picked from commit 1a1bfc38cc)
(cherry picked from commit 083d5aefed)
(cherry picked from commit 4586096be9)
(cherry picked from commit 039fa20cc8)
(cherry picked from commit 3ec9cb5f59)
- Currently the confirmation for dangerous actions such as transferring
the repository or deleting it only requires the user to ~~copy paste~~
type the repository name.
- This can be problematic when the user has a fork or another repository
with the same name as an organization's repository, and the confirmation
doesn't make clear that it could be deleting the wrong repository. While
it's mentioned in the dialog, it's better to be on the safe side and
also add the owner's name to be an element that has to be typed for
these dangerous actions.
- Added integration tests.
(cherry picked from commit bf679b24dd)
- As per https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/53#issuecomment-1070207
- Using the `CODEOWNERS` feature it should speed up the development
process for contributors as for the most common PRs the right reviewers
will be added by Forgejo automatically. They can be added very
precisely according to the changed files of the PR.
- This feature is implemented in v1.21, which means it's not available
on Codeberg.
(cherry picked from commit 1511ef1c80)
(cherry picked from commit 99999e3a03)
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 57e597bf7e)
(cherry picked from commit 643a2b0e81)
(cherry picked from commit f10faffb4f)
(cherry picked from commit b440c5767e)
[TESTS] verify facts for the admin storage documentation (squash)
(cherry picked from commit d83d8ce57b)
(cherry picked from commit d8855ef27c)
(cherry picked from commit 11230466ec)
(cherry picked from commit b2cdd9d971)
The tests at tests/integration/migration-test/migration_test.go will
not run any Forgejo migration when using the gitea-*.sql.gz files
because they do not contain a ForgejoVersion row which is interpreted
as a new Forgejo installation for which there is no need for migration.
Create a situation by which the ForgejoVersion table exists and has a
version of 0 in tests/integration/migration-test/forgejo-v1.19.0.*.sql.gz
thus ensuring all Forgejo migrations are run.
The forgejo*.sql.gz files do not have any Gitea related records, which
will be interpreted by the Gitea migrations as a new installation that
does not need any migration. As a consequence the migration tests run
when using forgejo-v1.19.0.*.sql.gz are exclusively about Forgejo
migrations.
(cherry picked from commit ec8003859c)
(cherry picked from commit 697570ff39)
(cherry picked from commit f041aec172)
(cherry picked from commit 60463e3bab)
(cherry picked from commit b2fc2a7c13)
(cherry picked from commit fb2759b6af)
(cherry picked from commit 37cfc3b227)
- Implements https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/32#issuecomment-918737
- Allows to add Forgejo-specific migrations that don't interfere with Gitea's migration logic. Please do note that we cannot liberally add migrations for Gitea tables, as they might do their own migrations in a future version on that table, and that could undo our migrations. Luckily, we don't have a scenario where that's needed and thus not taken into account.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/795
(cherry picked from commit 8ee32978c0)
(cherry picked from commit c240b34f59)
(cherry picked from commit 03936c6492)
(cherry picked from commit a20ed852f8)
(cherry picked from commit 1dfa82676f)
(cherry picked from commit c39ae0bf8a)
(cherry picked from commit cfaff08996)
(cherry picked from commit 94a458835a)
(cherry picked from commit 61a3cf77df)
(cherry picked from commit abb350fde8)
(cherry picked from commit 5194829d6b)
(cherry picked from commit 89239a60f2)
(cherry picked from commit 683cfd86ef)
(cherry picked from commit f4546cfed9)
(cherry picked from commit 86614d5826)
(cherry picked from commit e4b9c32187)
(cherry picked from commit 8c253719af)
Follow-up to d58c542579 for Forgejo.
By default, Gitea does not select any map service that can be used
to introduce a 'Show this place on a map' button in the location
field of a user profile. Before I tried upstreaming this change to
Gitea, this was the case in Forgejo. This patch essentially recovers
this functionality, which is nice for public-facing instances and
communities.
Links to original PRs:
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1076
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26214
(cherry picked from commit bb187d5f61)
(cherry picked from commit ce02ef9078)
(cherry picked from commit 6b75c40e25)
(cherry picked from commit 6bc8e9f573)
(cherry picked from commit 063f8afdf7)
(cherry picked from commit c5cc736b72)
(cherry picked from commit 7b1bb4bedc)
(cherry picked from commit 2a022dceb4)
